Programs run on evidence, not on anecdote.
We build outcome systems for non-profits, INGOs, and foundations. Programs are designed against measured effect. Reports defend themselves.
Mission is the metric. The metric is rarely measured.
Most non-profits run on dedicated people, mission-driven decisions, and reporting frameworks designed for funders rather than for programs. The theory of change is a document. The measurement system is a spreadsheet. The reports take weeks.
Reports for funders, not programs
Donor reports, board reports, and program reviews each demand a different cut of the same data. Each is assembled by hand at the end of a cycle.
Theory of change in the document, not the system
The logic model lives in a PDF written at proposal time. The data system collects what was budgeted to collect, not what would prove the theory.
Outcomes tracked at moments, not over time
Pre and post surveys close the project loop. What happened to beneficiaries six or twelve months later is rarely measured at all.
Restricted funds, unrestricted operations
Multiple funder mandates, multiple cost categories, one programmatic team. Reconciling the chart of accounts to the work plan consumes weeks every quarter.
Programs designed to measure what they promise.
We build outcome systems that turn theory of change into a working measurement architecture, automate funder reporting, and let program teams see beneficiary effect in time to act on it. The deliverable is a system, not a logic model.
One outcome ledger, many reports
Donor, board, and program views generated from a single outcome ledger. Reports become queries, not assemblies.
Theory of change as a system
The logic model becomes the data model. Indicators are wired to data sources from the day the program launches, not at year-end.
Longitudinal beneficiary tracking
Consented follow-up frameworks that track outcomes at six, twelve, and twenty-four months. Programs learn from results, not from closing reports.
Reconciled fund-to-program view
Restricted, unrestricted, and matched funding mapped to programmatic activity in one ledger. Quarterly reconciliation moves from a project to a property.
Built for the work, defended by the evidence
Outcome ledgers, consented beneficiary follow-up, and funder reporting wired into the programs that actually deliver change — so the report defends itself.
Build for mission-driven organisations with the modular components
A central outcome ladder — inputs to impact — surrounded by the capabilities and primitives that make it run. Explore each component.
What we build with mission-driven organisations
Outcome ledger across the portfolio.
One system over the entire program portfolio. Indicators, baselines, and follow-ups in a single queryable surface the team uses weekly, not quarterly.
Theory-of-change instrumentation.
The logic model wired to data sources at program launch. Indicators populate as the program runs. Mid-program corrections become possible.
Funder reporting that builds itself.
Donor, foundation, and statutory reports generated from the outcome ledger. Submitted in days, not weeks. Auditors get queryable evidence.
Beneficiary follow-up systems.
Consented, ethical follow-up at six, twelve, and twenty-four months post-engagement. Outcomes survive the closing report and reach the next design.
Field data capture, low connectivity.
Mobile capture for field teams. Offline-first, sync-aware, with provenance preserved end to end.
Restricted-fund accountability.
Restricted, unrestricted, and matched funding mapped to programmatic activity. Audit-ready throughout the cycle, not at quarter close.
Building the future of mission outcomes
A regional education non-profit across five countries unified its programmatic M&E into a single outcome ledger over an 18-week engagement. Three funder formats now generate from the same ledger.
Read the engagementA community health non-profit built a consented, offline-first follow-up framework for maternal and child health beneficiaries. Outcomes now feed back into program design within the same fiscal year.
Read the engagementA grant-making foundation running ~40 simultaneous grants moved restricted-fund reconciliation from a quarterly project to a continuous property — now the system of record for finance and programs.
Read the engagementDive deeper into non-profit systems on Grids and Guides
Trusted by
